Tuesday, 24 January 2017

MOVIE REVIEW: WAR DOGS (2016)

War Dogs follows the story of David and Efron. Former high school best friends who drifted apart, they get back together at a high school friends funeral. After catching up, they become business partners in selling guns to the war in Iraq.

While things start out smoothly enough, things get more complicated when they land bigger contracts. The movie then follows them as they get more involved as things keep going from bad to worse and they discover that the world of arms dealing isn’t as safe as when they first started.

Predictably, some deals go wrong. David learns a valuable life lesson about how exciting isn’t always good, and the friend everyone warns him about ends up being a jerk. So this is a standard morale story that tries to inject some Wolf of Wall Street into it.

At the end of the day, this is perhaps its biggest and most unforgiving flaw. It follows the most boring character to tell the most generic story. It takes no risks and wraps everything up with a “what lessons did we learn here?” final tag in the closing scenes. And somehow everything kind-of ends up okay for David.

This movie might have been more interesting if it followed Efron and left an audience surrogate behind (or confined to voice-overs, like Wolf). It is the equivalent of if Wolf of Wall Street followed one of Leonardo’s junior employees. Doesn’t quite sound very interesting, does it.

At the end of the day, it was an interesting premise. It was definitely better than the DC worst-of series this year. But it has to have a hard pass for being too generic for its own good. If you want a pretty generic story done extremely well, Kubo and the Two Strings is worth your time much, much more.


1.5 out of 5 dog-eared waffles.

No comments:

Post a Comment